View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001758 | AI War 1 / Classic | Note To Test | Dec 3, 2010 10:29 pm | Dec 4, 2010 1:05 am | |
| Reporter | Draco18s | Assigned To | Chris_McElligottPark | ||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 4.044 | ||||
| Fixed in Version | 4.045 | ||||
| Summary | 0001758: Neinzuls Reclaimable? | ||||
| Description | Last I knew Neinzul ships (AI or Minor Faction) were not and should not be reclaimable. Screenshot shows some weasels I reclaimed (which died almost instantly, took a while to get a good pic). None of the Neinzul ships the AI threw at us that wave had immune to reclamation. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Internal Weight | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
Blades spawned by the blade spawner spire ship are also reclaimable, although they were being turned by a zombie guardian. |
|
|
Yes, I've reported that. 0001469 |
|
|
neinzul ships themselves are not immune to reclamation, however like you said its kinda hard to actually maintain a force of them through reclamation because of their attrition. edit wait what? who screwed up the linking logic? |
|
|
Lance: at one time they WERE immune to reclamation because reclaiming them was pointless. And the formatting? That was broke when they implemented BBCode. It's busted everywhere. See # 1734 |
|
|
oh.. huh. Never particularly used them, nor reclamation enough to note the difference. apparently linking is fixed now o.0 |
|
|
By the way, the [b]BBCode[/b] still works. It was the Code Formatting that broke it. Two different mods. Anyway, the change: * All Neinzul ships in general are now immune to reclamation. This makes them excellent against botnet golems in particular now. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2010 10:29 pm | Draco18s | New Issue | |
| Dec 3, 2010 10:29 pm | Draco18s | File Added: Screenshot_2010_12_03_20_18_32.png | |
| Dec 3, 2010 10:43 pm | PineappleSam | Note Added: 0005101 | |
| Dec 3, 2010 10:44 pm | Draco18s | Note Added: 0005102 | |
| Dec 3, 2010 11:25 pm | Lancefighter | Note Added: 0005112 | |
| Dec 3, 2010 11:25 pm | Lancefighter | Note Edited: 0005112 | |
| Dec 3, 2010 11:28 pm | Draco18s | Note Added: 0005113 | |
| Dec 3, 2010 11:29 pm | Lancefighter | Note Added: 0005116 | |
| Dec 4, 2010 1:05 am | Chris_McElligottPark | Note Added: 0005137 | |
| Dec 4, 2010 1:05 am | Chris_McElligottPark | Status | new => resolved |
| Dec 4, 2010 1:05 am | Chris_McElligottPark | Fixed in Version | => 4.045 |
| Dec 4, 2010 1:05 am | Chris_McElligottPark | Resolution | open => fixed |
| Dec 4, 2010 1:05 am | Chris_McElligottPark | Assigned To | => Chris_McElligottPark |
