View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000711 | AI War 1 / Classic | Suggestion - Balance Tweaks | Oct 19, 2010 3:30 pm | Jan 3, 2011 11:45 am | |
| Reporter | orzelek | Assigned To | Chris_McElligottPark | ||
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 3.718 | ||||
| Summary | 0000711: Contradiction with guardians and turrets | ||||
| Description | First we received some buffs to turrets because of guardians were introduced - but all guardians are expert turret killers which means that turrets are useless as defense against them. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Internal Weight | |||||
|
|
Well, I should have been a bit more clear -- the buff to turrets was so that the turrets could do without your fleet ships better when you're on offense. But the guardians are meant to be expert counter-attackers, so you still have a risk/reward dynamic on there. We don't want players to be able to just have their entire fleet out in one big blob, ever, without serious risk to their defenses. I don't claim that the relationships and balance are perfect at the moment, but this part is conceptually as intended. In short, the buff to turrets was for fighting off starships, waves, and the other non-guardian stuff, whereas the guardians are particularly siege-breaking type ships. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2010 3:30 pm | orzelek | New Issue | |
| Oct 19, 2010 3:35 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Note Added: 0001327 | |
| Oct 19, 2010 3:35 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Status | new => resolved |
| Oct 19, 2010 3:35 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Resolution | open => no change required |
| Oct 19, 2010 3:35 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Assigned To | => Chris_McElligottPark |
| Jan 3, 2011 11:45 am | Chris_McElligottPark | Status | resolved => closed |
