0012004: "Reference" table "opponent wins ?" sorting logic

ID	Project	Category		Date Submitted	Last Update

0012004	AI War 1 / Classic	Suggestion - Interface Ideas - Game and Menu Controls		Jul 25, 2013 1:37 pm	Aug 6, 2014 11:30 pm

Reporter	alocritani	Assigned To
Status	new	Resolution	open
Product Version	7.009

Summary	0012004: "Reference" table "opponent wins ?" sorting logic
Description	I find a bit strange the way "opponent win" column is sorted. In the example, it starts with the lowest chance to win (87%) and then goes up to max possibility to win (98%) then draw then highest chance to loss (81%) and finally lowest chance to loss (50%). I would find a better approach to display data ordered this way: win 98 ... win 87 draw loss 50 ... loss 81 the same for reversing order. this way it's easy to find best and worse counter for every target
Tags	No tags attached.

Internal Weight

alocritani Jul 25, 2013 1:37 pm reporter	order.jpg (73,510 bytes) order.jpg (73,510 bytes)

Bognor Jul 29, 2013 9:48 pm reporter ~0033179	Yep. Another example: filter cap vs cap, mark I, fleet ships, then select Neinzul Scapegoat and sort by "Opponent wins?". Bombers win by a bee's whisker and Space Tanks lose by a bee's whisker, so you'd expect those two to be next to each other. In fact, Bombers and Space Tanks are at opposite ends of the list.

AdamMil Aug 6, 2014 11:30 pm reporter ~0038885	Yes, the sorting is wrong and confusing. It should be very simple to fix!

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
Jul 25, 2013 1:37 pm	alocritani	New Issue
Jul 25, 2013 1:37 pm	alocritani	File Added: order.jpg
Jul 26, 2013 10:51 am	alocritani	Summary	"Reference" table opponent win sorting logic => "Reference" table "opponent win ?" sorting logic
Jul 26, 2013 10:51 am	alocritani	Summary	"Reference" table "opponent win ?" sorting logic => "Reference" table "opponent wins ?" sorting logic
Jul 29, 2013 9:48 pm	Bognor	Note Added: 0033179
Aug 6, 2014 11:30 pm	AdamMil	Note Added: 0038885