View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0025801 | AI War 2 | Bug - Other | Nov 12, 2021 8:36 am | Nov 15, 2021 5:49 pm | |
| Reporter | RocketAssistedPuffin | Assigned To | Chris_McElligottPark | ||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | Beta 3.750 Smooth Simulator | ||||
| Fixed in Version | Beta 3.751 Faction Processing Groups | ||||
| Summary | 0025801: Called ElderlingsElderlingsLRP pathfinder again before it finished finding the first path! | ||||
| Description | 3.750 SINGLEP DELAYED10 TID79 Called ElderlingsElderlingsLRP pathfinder again before it finished finding the first path! This probably means it's being called by two threads! Run started: 0 ticks ago (0ms) at System.Environment.get_StackTrace () [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at Arcen.Universal.ArcenDebugging.ArcenDebugLog (System.String Message, Arcen.Universal.Verbosity Verbosity) [0x00000] in <c2a09fa7828c4a658708fa1f6e00464b>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.ArcenPathfinder`1[N].FindPathInner (Arcen.AIW2.Core.Faction Fac, System.String DebugAddendum, Arcen.Universal.List`1[T] PathToFill, N Origin, N Target, System.Int32 NeedToGetWithinXRangeOfTarget, System.Int32 RequiresNoMoreThanXRangeFromOrigin, System.Boolean DoDebugLog, Arcen.AIW2.Core.ArcenSimContextAnyStatus Context) [0x00000] in <af5ef548ed2c45d982be76ca809f7ab2>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.ArcenPathfinder`1[N].FindPath (Arcen.AIW2.Core.Faction Fac, System.String DebugAddendum, Arcen.Universal.List`1[T] PathToFill, N Origin, N Target, System.Int32 NeedToGetWithinXRangeOfTarget, System.Int32 RequiresNoMoreThanXRangeFromOrigin, System.Boolean DoDebugLog, Arcen.AIW2.Core.ArcenSimContextAnyStatus Context) [0x00000] in <af5ef548ed2c45d982be76ca809f7ab2>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.PathingHelper.InnerFindPath_Raw (Arcen.AIW2.Core.Faction faction, System.String DebugAddendum, Arcen.AIW2.Core.Planet Origin, Arcen.AIW2.Core.Planet Target, Arcen.AIW2.External.PathingMode mode, Arcen.AIW2.Core.ArcenSimContextAnyStatus Context) [0x00000] in <af5ef548ed2c45d982be76ca809f7ab2>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.PathingHelper.FindPathFreshOrFromCache (Arcen.AIW2.Core.Faction ForFaction, System.String DebugAddendum, Arcen.AIW2.Core.Planet Origin, Arcen.AIW2.Core.Planet Target, Arcen.AIW2.External.PathingMode mode, Arcen.AIW2.Core.ArcenSimContextAnyStatus Context) [0x00000] in <af5ef548ed2c45d982be76ca809f7ab2>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.ElderlingsFactionDeepInfo.DoLongRangePlanning_OnBackgroundNonSimThread_Subclass (Arcen.AIW2.External.ArcenLongTermIntermittentPlanningContext Context) [0x00000] in <ac3b1f678e8044df82357cd1f96348c1>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.ExternalFactionDeepInfoRoot.DoLongRangePlanning_OnBackgroundNonSimThread_HostOnly (Arcen.AIW2.Core.ILongRangePlanningHostContext Context) [0x00000] in <ac3b1f678e8044df82357cd1f96348c1>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.Core.Faction.Safe_DeepInfo_DoLongRangePlanning_OnBackgroundNonSimThread_HostOnly (Arcen.AIW2.Core.ILongRangePlanningHostContext Context) [0x00000] in <3a199007cbeb47ed862f6cf7e3d06c59>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.SpecialFactionPlanning.Execute () [0x00000] in <ac3b1f678e8044df82357cd1f96348c1>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.ArcenHostOnlySimPlanningContext.BackgroundThreadRunHandler (System.Boolean FailSilentlyIfNotFinishedYet) [0x00000] in <af5ef548ed2c45d982be76ca809f7ab2>:0 at Arcen.AIW2.External.ArcenHostOnlySimPlanningContext+<>c__DisplayClass13_0.<RunOnBackgroundThread>b__0 () [0x00000] in <af5ef548ed2c45d982be76ca809f7ab2>:0 at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InnerInvoke () [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute () [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecutionContextCallback (System.Object obj) [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal (System.Threading.ExecutionContext executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, System.Object state, System.Boolean preserveSyncCtx) [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run (System.Threading.ExecutionContext executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, System.Object state, System.Boolean preserveSyncCtx) [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteWithThreadLocal (System.Threading.Tasks.Task& currentTaskSlot) [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteEntry (System.Boolean bPreventDoubleExecution) [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.System.Threading.IThreadPoolWorkItem.ExecuteWorkItem () [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueue.Dispatch () [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 at System.Threading._ThreadPoolWaitCallback.PerformWaitCallback () [0x00000] in <695d1cc93cca45069c528c15c9fdd749>:0 | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| related to | 0025822 | resolved | Chris_McElligottPark | Neinzul SappersSappersLRP pathfinder threading exception |
|
|
Thanks! * Improved the pathfinding error handling debug info. * Added a new processing_group="Name" on faction definitions that is required. ** This allows us to aggregate "hey, am I allowed to run at the same time?" in the way we really need to. We had something like this before, but not enough. ** This in turn requires new xml in a new folder called SpecialFactionProcessingGroup, and that fills a SpecialFactionProcessingGroup object in the code, which is mostly used for LRP threading locks. * UniqueNameForFactionToAvoidThreadConflicts has been removed, replaced with a reference to the faction's SpecialFactionProcessingGroup. * Okay! This has been a problem for longer than I realized, as it turns out; it just has been more obvious in recent months. ** Essentially, the way we were handling factions that used shared resources for their "LRP processing" previously only attempted to not let them START in the same lrp sim cycle, but it was not preventing them from starting in multiple cycles and thus overlapping. ** Good grief, this was more untangling than expected. This SHOULD prove to be the end of any sort of "pathfinder already running" errors, but we'll have to wait longer and see if folks still run into it. I really don't think they will, knock on wood. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 8:36 am | RocketAssistedPuffin | New Issue | |
| Nov 12, 2021 11:30 am | BadgerBadger | Assigned To | => Chris_McElligottPark |
| Nov 12, 2021 11:30 am | BadgerBadger | Status | new => assigned |
| Nov 14, 2021 3:57 pm | BadgerBadger | Relationship added | related to 0025822 |
| Nov 15, 2021 5:49 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Status | assigned => resolved |
| Nov 15, 2021 5:49 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Resolution | open => fixed |
| Nov 15, 2021 5:49 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Fixed in Version | => Beta 3.751 Faction Processing Groups |
| Nov 15, 2021 5:49 pm | Chris_McElligottPark | Note Added: 0063309 |
